R. R. Ilyazov, A. Kh. Shakhverdiev
Sergo Ordzhonikidze Russian State University for Geological Prospecting (MGRI), Moscow, Russia
Real-time determination of fluid contacts during horizontal well drilling using mud gas logging
The article analyzes real-time detection of gas-oil (GOC) and oil-water (OWC) contacts during horizontal drilling in clastic reservoirs. Timely localization ensures high-quality geosteering, keeping the wellbore within the pay zone and preventing undesirable fluid intersections. Relying solely on conventional logging-while-drilling (LWD) is often insufficient. Limitations arise from electrical macroanisotropy distorting resistivity data, the clay electrical double layer masking responses, and tool «blind zones» causing delayed observations, which poses a critical risk in horizontal drilling. To address this, advanced mud gas logging is proposed. Instead of indirect electrophysical features, this method captures actual reservoir fluid dynamics. By using chromatographic analysis of C1–C5 fractions and calculating Wetness, Balance, and Pixler ratios, characteristic fluid signatures and transition zones are identified. Crucially, reliable interpretation requires mathematical normalization of gas data. Without it, operational artifacts from rate of penetration (ROP) and mud flow rate fluctuations create false anomalies or obscure actual boundaries. An Eastern Siberian field case study demonstrates that normalized mud gas logging achieved real-time GOC localization with sub-meter accuracy in a low-contrast reservoir. Validated by pulsed neutron logging (PNL),
this method proves to be an effective geosteering and risk management tool.
Keywords: mud gas logging; horizontal wells; gas-oil contact (GOC); oil-water contact (OWC); geosteering; mud logging; gas chromatography; gas data normalization.
Date submitted: 18.05.2026 Date accepted: 11.06.2026
References
- Irani, M., Bashtani, F., Kantzas, A. (2021). Control of gas cresting/coning in horizontal wells with tubing-deployed inflow control devices. Fuel, 293, 120328.
- Basniev, K. S., Dmitriev, N. M., Rozenberg, G. D. (2005). Oil and gas hydromechanics: textbook for universities. Moscow-Izhevsk: Institute of Computer Science.
- Gimatudinov, Sh. K., Shirkovsky, A. I. (2019). Physics of oil and gas reservoir: textbook. Moscow: Alliance Publishing House.
- Mo, J., Mikhailov, N. N. (2025). Effect of capillary number on the residual oil saturation during chemical flooding. Georesources, 27(3), 233-242.
- Shakhverdiev, A. Kh. (2024). The influence of hysteresis phenomena in oil production on the oil recovery factor. Oil Industry, 6, 92-97.
- Shestopalov, Yu. V., Shakhverdiev, A. Kh. (2023). Three-phase dynamical systems and their applications to monitoring for the development of hydrocarbon fields. Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics, 44(11), 5045-5056.
- Shestopalov, Y. V., Shakhverdiev, A. Kh., Arefiev, S. V. (2024). Bifurcations associated with three-phase polynomial dynamical systems and complete description of symmetry relations using discriminant criterion. Symmetry, 16(1), 14.
- Shakhverdiev, A. Kh., Denisov, A. V., Tumanova, V. D. (2021). New optimization criteria of waterflood patterns preventing premature water breakthrough in the context of water-oil displacement front instability. In: Tyumen 2021. Subsoil Management as a Cross-Functional Process. Proceedings of the 7th Scientific and Practical Conference on Oil and Gas Exploration, Moscow.
- Shakhverdiev, A. Kh., Arefiev, S. V. (2023). Prediction of water breakthrough during waterflooding under unstable water displacement front conditions. SOCAR Proceedings, 3, 58-67.
- Aliev, Z. S., Sheremet, V. V. (1995). Determination of the productivity of horizontal wells penetrating gas and gas-oil reservoirs. Moscow: Nedra.
- Shakhverdiev, A. Kh., Ilyazov, R. R., Arefiev, S. V., Pozdyshev, A. S. (2023). On including highly water-cut reserves of oil-undersaturated reservoirs into the hard-to-recover category. Oil Industry, 4, 34-39.
- Darling, T. (2005). Well logging and formation evaluation. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
- Mirzadzhanzade, A. Kh., Shakhverdiev, A. Kh., Kuznetsov, O. L., Mirzadzhanova, D. D. (2000). Phase plane method for well log interpretation. Geologiya Nefti i Gaza, 3, 36-39.
- Worthington, P. F. (2000). Recognition and evaluation of low-resistivity pay. Petroleum Geoscience, 6(1), 77-92.
- Ellis, D. V., Singer, J. M. (2007). Well logging for earth scientists. Vol. 692. Springer.
- Ilyazov, R. R., Nikiforov, S. A., Chernikov, E. Yu., Rakhimov, T. R. (2023). Application of mud gas logging for geosteering and operational determination of inter-fluid contacts during horizontal well drilling. Oil Industry, 2, 72-77.
- Ilyazov, R. R. (2023). Modern capabilities of mud gas logging during well drilling and the need for its comprehensive metrological support. Construction of Oil and Gas Wells on Land And Sea, 8, 11-18.
- Ilyazov, R. R. (2025). Development potential of mud gas logging during well drilling. Oilfield Engineering, 8(680), 11-16.
- Ilyazov, R.R. (2024). Using mud logging data to solve non-standard tasks during oil and gas well construction. Construction of Oil and Gas Wells on Land And Sea, 9(381), 39-44.
- Loermans, T. (2017). Advanced mud logging: First among equals. Georesursy, 19(3), Part 1, 216-221.
- Lukyanov, E. E. (2011). Interpretation of mud logging data. Novosibirsk: Historical Heritage of Siberia Publishing House.
- Ilyazov, R. R. (2025). Informational value of mud gas logging in modern drilling conditions. Burenie i Neft, 5, 47-51.
- Haworth, J., Sellens, M., Whittaker, A. (1985). Interpretation of hydrocarbon shows using light (C1-C5) hydrocarbon gases from mud-log data. AAPG Bulletin, 69(8), 1305-1310.
- Pixler, B. O. (1969). Formation evaluation by analysis of hydrocarbon ratios. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 21(6), 665-670.
- Staroselsky, V. I. (1990). Ethane, propane, butane in natural gases of oil and gas basins. Moscow: Nedra.
- Whittaker, A., Sellens, G. (1987). Normalization of gas shows improves evaluation. Oil & Gas Journal, 85(16), 53-60.
- Whittaker, A. (Ed.). (1985). Mud logging: Principles and interpretations. Boston: IHRDC.
- Amade, W. (2003). Mud gas isotope logging. Journal of Japanese Association for Petroleum, 74(1), 107-110.
- Amith, N., Kurawle, I., Kaul, M., et al. (2009). Mud gas isotope logging using mass spectrometry. SPE-121004-MS. In: The Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference & Exhibition, Jakarta, Indonesia, August.
- Ilyazov, R. R. (2026). From expert evaluation to intelligent systems: Automation of mud logging data verification and interpretation. Bulletin of Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, 1, 85-91.
- Radhakrishnan, S., Srikanth, G., Mehta, C. H. (1991). Segmentation of well logs by maximum-likelihood estimation. Computers & Geosciences, 17(9), 1173–1196.
- Bhatt, A., Helle, H. B. (2002). Committee neural networks for porosity and permeability prediction from well logs. Geophysical Prospecting, 50(6), 645–660.
- Pan, S. J., Yang, Q. (2010). A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 22(10), 1345–1359.
- Hegde, C., Daigle, H., Millwater, H., Gray, K. (2017). Analysis of rate of penetration (ROP) prediction in drilling using physics-based and data-driven models. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 159, 295–306.
- Ao, Y., Li, H., Zhu, L., et al. (2019). The linear random forest algorithm and its advantages in machine learning assisted logging regression modeling. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 174, 776–789.
- Bressan, T. S., de Souza, M. K., Girelli, T. J., Junior, F. C. (2020). Evaluation of machine learning methods for lithology classification using geophysical data. Computers & Geosciences, 139, 104475.
- Noshi, C. I., Schubert, J. J. (2018). The role of machine learning in drilling operations: a review. SPE-191823-MS. In: The SPE/AAPG Eastern Regional Meeting, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, October.
DOI: 10.5510/OGP20260201194
E-mail: shahverdievah@mgri.ru
M. V. Kuzmina1, Sh. Z. Ismayilov2, R. R. Stepanova3, I. F. Galiullina3, I. G. Fattakhov1, A. A. Pimenov1, T. I. Iusifov4
1TatNIPIneft – PJSC TATNEFT, Almetyevsk, Russia; 2Azerbaijan Oil and Industry University, Baku, Azerbaijan; 3Ufa State Petroleum Technical University, Ufa, Russia; 4RN-BashNIPIneft LLC (Rosneft Oil Company), Ufa, Russia
Justification of the effectiveness of the technology of low-mineralized flooding factory in the conditions of fractured carbonate reservoirs of the oil and gas condensate field
One of the promising EOR technologies is a relatively recent technique of injecting low-salinity water into carbonate reservoirs. There are some Russian and foreign papers studying the effect of changing the injected water properties on the rate of production and reservoir recovery. Most of the studies analyze the effect of water composition on terrigenous reservoirs, while there are few studies concerning carbonate reservoirs. Therefore, development of carbonate reservoirs and their waterflooding, in particular, is of great interest. The paper discusses production target III of an oil and gas condensate field, composed of the Bobrikovian carbonate rocks. This heterogeneous, tight, fractured reservoir is currently developed under depletion drive. Reservoir stimulation is not provided by design, which indicates deficiency of field development strategy, preventing exploitation of full potential of this reservoir. To obtain an objective, a problematic zones in production target III has been analyzed. This analysis considered cumulative production against a thickness map between OWC and the upper carbonate reservoir. An extensive analysis of water sources was carried out for future use of this water as a reservoir-repressuring agent, as well as compatibility of the injected water, reservoir rock, and underlying groundwater was analyzed with regard to predicted chemical reactions. Laboratory testing of core samples was performed using a gas permeameter-porosimeter. For estimating efficient parameters of a reservoir pressure maintenance system is well interference study. Understanding well interference in carbonate reservoirs is complicated by natural fracturing, so, Express Pressure Tool data has been interpreted to analyze well interference.
Keywords: water flooding; injected water; salt content; reservoir rock; underlying groundwater compatibility.
Date submitted: 01.04.2025 Date accepted: 21.01.2026
References
- Biserov, A. O. (2022). Overview of low-salinity flooding and its development. Enigma, 44, 124-127.
- Burdenyuk, O. O., Kozhevnikov, A. V. (2016). Review of the efficiency of using low-salinity flooding of terrigenous reservoirs. Nauchnyj Forum. Sibir, 2(4), 11.
- Aghdam, S. Kh., Kazemi, A., Ahmadi, M. (2023). Studying the effect of various surfactants on the possibility and intensity of fine migration during low-salinity water flooding in clay-rich sandstones. Results in Engineering, 18, 101149.
- Keller, Yu. A., Uskov, A. A., Krivoguz, A. N. (2020). Application of SVKTT technology to assess the efficiency of flooding with low-mineralized water of the carbonate formation of the Kharyaginskoye field. Oil Industry, 7, 109-113.
- Loj, G., Nguen, S., Al-Sarihi, A. (2020, September). Enhanced oil recovery in low-salinity sandstone core flooding as a result of wettability changes and fine particle migration. In: Abstracts of 3nd International Scientific-Practical Conference
«Current issues in the study of oil and gas reservoir systems» (SPRS-2020). Moscow: LLC «Research Institute of Natural Gases and Gas Technologies - Gazprom VNIIGAZ».
- Bessej, I. E., Antoniadi, D. G., Antiga, R. E., Nkpa, O. (2018). Numerical modeling of low-salinity waterflooding. Oil and Gas Technologies, 2(115), 35-39.
- Podzorova, M. S., Aminov, K. Yu. (2020). Flooding of rocks of the Bazhenov formation with low-mineralized water. In: Proceedings of the National Scientific and Practical Conference «Oil and Gas: Technologies and Innovations», Tyumen Industrial University, Tyumen, November 19–20.
- Faizov, I. A., Garifullin, A. Sh., Mukhametshin, V. Sh., et al. (2023). Industrial experiment at the Novo-Khazinskaya area of the Arlan field – 60 years later. SOCAR Proceedings, 1, 107-116.
- Agishev, E. R., Andreev, V. E., Mukhametshin, V. Sh., et al. (2023). Improving the efficiency of putting oil deposits with hard-to-recover reserves of Western Siberia into development. SOCAR Proceedings, 2, 80-90.
- Aliyev, N. Sh. (2024). Waterflood reservoir modelling for Chirag oilfield. SOCAR Proceedings, 1, 40-47.
- Selimov, A. D., Tananyhin, D. S. (2021, May). Rationale for the use of low-salinity flooding at a late stage of oil field development. In: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference «Current issues of scientific knowledge. New technologies of fuel and energy complex». Tyumen: Tyumen Industrial University.
- Saptarova, Z. R., Mamonov, A. A., Usmanov, S. A. (2022). Potential increase in the efficiency of oil production in terrigenous deposits at deposits in the Republic of Tatarstan based on low-mineralized water. Georesources, 24(4), 82-90.
- Gajdukov, L. A. (2020). Approaches to hydrodynamic modeling in conditions of anomalous manifestation of geological and technological effects during the development of non-standard reservoirs. Oilfield Business, 9(621), 5-13.
- Turgazinov, I. K., Ensepbaev, T. A. (2018). Injection of low-mineralized water to displace medium-viscosity oil. Advances in Science and Technology. Collection of articles of the XII International Scientific and Practical Conference. In 2 parts. Vol.1 Part I. Moscow: Limited Liability Company «Aktualnost.RF».
- Mirsaetov, O. M., Trefilova, T. V., Ahmadullin, K. B. (2024). Method of developing a highly watered oil deposit. RU Patent № 2825909.
- Hisamov, R. S., Ahmetgareev, V. V., Podavalov, V. B. (2019). Method of developing oil reservoirs by injecting water with variable properties. RU Patent № 2679006.
- Zaharov, V. P., Umergalin, T. G., Shevlyakov, F. B., Murzabekov, B. E. (2013). Method of desalination of gas condensates. RU Patent № 2473667.
- Ahmetgareev, V. V., Bakirov, A. I. (2013). Analysis of efficiency and optimization of flooding parameters in the development of carbonate reservoirs of Tatarstan fields. Oil Industry, 7, 28-29.
- Zaharchenko, E. I., Andrejko, N. G. (2022). Assessment of geological uncertainties in the development of fractured reservoirs. Bulatov Readings, 1, 204-205.
- Kolganov, V. I. (2003). The influence of fracturing of carbonate reservoirs on their development indicators during flooding. Oil Industry, 11, 51-54.
- Komisarenko, A. S., Kochetov, A. V., Zagorovskij, A. A., et al. (2021). The problem of substantiating the coefficient of oil displacement by water from cavernous-fractured carbonate reservoirs. Geology of Oil and Gas, 4, 51-57.
- Kupesheva, A., Ahmedzhan, S., Abdygalieva, A., et al. (2022). Technological necessity of modern gas injection at the Karachaganak field. Science and Education, 3(68), 242-251.
- Mashkova, E. A., Muratov, A. T. (2021). Geological structure and conditions of formation of the oil-bearing subsalt complex of the Karachaganak field. Bulatov Readings, 1, 64-66.
- Melehin, S. V., Mihajlov, N. N. (2015). New data on residual oil mobilization during carbonate reservoir flooding. In: The International Scientific Symposium «Theory and Practice of Application of Methods of Enhanced Oil Recovery», All-Russian Oil and Gas Research Institute named after Academician A.P. Krylov, Moscow, September 16-17.
DOI: 10.5510/OGP20260201195
E-mail: i-fattakhov@rambler.ru
Rihab A. Deabl, Mohammed S. Al-Jawad
College of Engineering, University of Baghdad, Iraq
Application of machine learning technique in water, chemical, and thermal flooding: review paper
This article aims to provide literature for the development of new technologies in enhanced oil recovery (EOR), with a focus on reservoir modelling using machine learning (ML). The inaccuracy and inefficiency of traditional physics-based numerical simulations necessitate the development of faster and more intelligent tools. This review serves as a comprehensive resource on applied ML approaches for reservoir modelling. This research classifies the previous artificial intelligence (AI) research in EOR into three methods: water flooding (WF), chemical enhanced oil recovery (CEOR), and thermal flooding. The comprehensive classification is based on the algorithm used, dataset, purpose, inputs, results, and evaluation for each method in each paper. A novel method for simulating dynamic fluid distributions in WF, the Conditional Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Network (CDC-GAN) significantly lowers computational costs while handling complex nonlinear relationships. Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) combined with Bayesian Random Forest (BRF) provides reliable proxy modelling and optimization, also the Echo State Network (ESN) improves prediction accuracy, however it requires high-quality historical data. While Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS) efficiently handle uncertainties, Least Square Support Vector Machines (LSSVM) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) demonstrate predictive capabilities for nonlinear relationships in the CEOR. This review emphasizes the role of Reinforcement Learning (RL) in thermal, along with the incorporation of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and clustering techniques for improved data interpretation. Consequently, this study presents a comprehensive analysis of AI techniques in Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) from 2009 to 2024, offering researchers and technical experts insights for future investigations.
Keywords: Bayesian random forest; particle swarm optimisation; least square support vector machine; ANNs; reinforcement learning.
Date submitted: 16.07.2025 Date accepted: 05.02.2026
References
- Alvarado, V., Manrique, E. (2010). Enhanced oil recovery: field planning and development strategies. Gulf Professional Publishing.
- Hashim, A. H., Al-Jawad, M. S., Klati, K. A. (2023). Utilizing reservoir model to optimize future oil production for hydraulic fracture wells in tight reservoir. The Iraqi Geological Journal, 56(2B), 21-36.
- Ahmadi, M. A., Pournik, M. (2016). A predictive model of chemical flooding for enhanced oil recovery purposes: Application of least square support vector machine. Petroleum, 2(2), 177-182.
- Kuang, L., He, L. I. U., Yili, R. E. N., et al. (2021). Application and development trend of artificial intelligence in petroleum exploration and development. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 48(1), 1-14.
- Salleh, N., Yuhaniz, S. S., Azmi, N. F. M. (2022). Modelling orbital propagation using regression technique and artificial neural network. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 12(3), 1279–1286.
- Azim, R. A. (2022). A new correlation for calculating wellhead oil flow rate using artificial neural network. Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences, 3, 1-7.
- Sircar, A., Yadav, K., Rayavarapu, K., et al. (2021). Application of machine learning and artificial intelligence in oil and gas industry. Petroleum Research, 6, 379–391.
- Alkinani, H. H., Al-Hameedi, A. T. T., Dunn-Norman, S., Flori, R. E. (2019). Applications of artificial neural networks in the petroleum industry: A review. In: The SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, Manama, Bahrain.
- Bahaloo, S., Mehrizadeh, M., Najafi-Marghmaleki, A. (2023). Review of application of artificial intelligence techniques in petroleum operations. Petroleum Research, 8, 167–182.
- Solanki, P., Baldaniya, D., Jogani, D., et al. (2022). Artificial intelligence: New age of transformation in petroleum upstream. Petroleum Research, 7(1), 106-114.
- Tontiwachwuthikul, P., Chan, C. W., Zeng, F., et al. (2020). Recent progress and new developments of applications of artificial intelligence (AI), knowledge-based systems (KBS), and machine learning (ML) in the petroleum industry. Petroleum, 6, 319–320.
- Syah, R., Ahmadian, N., Elveny, M., et al. (2021). Implementation of artificial intelligence and support vector machine learning to estimate the drilling fluid density in high-pressure high-temperature wells. Energy Reports, 7, 4106-4113.
- Ghorbania, H., Wood, D. A., Choubineh, A., et al. (2018). Prediction of oil flow rate through an orifice flow meter: Artificial intelligence alternatives compared. Petroleum, 6(4), 404-414.
- Chakra, N. C., Song, K. Y., Gupta, M. M., Saraf, D. N. (2013). An innovative neural forecast of cumulative oil production from a petroleum reservoir employing higher-order neural networks (HONNs). Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 106, 18–33.
- AL-Assad, E. A., Hamd-Allah, S. M. (2024). Applying artificial neural networks with Bourgoyne and Young model to predict rate of penetration in Al-Garraf oil field. Journal of Engineering, 30(12), 146-166.
- Anifowose, F. A., Labadin, J., Abdulraheem, A. (2017). Ensemble machine learning: An untapped modelling paradigm for petroleum reservoir characterization. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 151, 480–487.
- Zhang, J., Yan, W. (1992). Summary of small well spacing waterflooding development and enhanced oil recovery test in Daqing oilfield. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2, 70–74.
- Wang, D., Wang, L., Zhang, F., et al. (2022). Research status and development direction of separated layer water injection technology in Bohai oilfield. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 34(2), 125–137
- Yang, Y., Cao, X. (2024). New comprehensive management method and engineering practice path for mature oilfields with high water cut. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 31(1), 54–62.
- Ketineni, S. P., Ertekin, T., Anbarci, K., Sneed, T. (2015, September). Structuring an integrative approach for field development planning using artificial intelligence and its application to an offshore oilfield. SPE-174871-MS. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, USA.
- Al-Husseini, A. K., Hamd-Allah, S. M., Hamzah, S. H. (2025). Enhancing sweep efficiency and delaying water breakthrough in carbonate reservoir: The impact of polymer flooding. Research Square
- Al-Dousari, M. M., Garrouch, A. A. (2013). An artificial neural network model for predicting the recovery performance of surfactant polymer floods. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 109, 51–62.
- Al-Rikaby, A. S., Al-Jawad, M. S. (2025). A novel method to recognise faults and reefs from history matching of gas production-case study: Mishrif reservoir, Southern Iraq. Iraqi Journal of Science, 66(1), 209-218.
- Shafiei, A., Ahmadi, M., Dusseault, M., et al. (2018). Data analytics techniques for performance prediction of steamflooding in naturally fractured carbonate reservoirs. Energies, 11(2), 292.
- Dong, X., Liu, H., Chen, Z., et al. (2019). Enhanced oil recovery techniques for heavy oil and oilsands reservoirs after steam injection. Applied energy, 239, 1190-1211.
- Pang, Z., Wang, L., Yin, F., Lyu, X. (2021). Steam chamber expanding processes and bottom water invading characteristics during steam flooding in heavy oil reservoirs. Energy, 234, 121214.
- Shin, H., Choe, J. (2009). Shale barrier effects on the SAGD performance. SPE-125211-MS. In: The SPE/EAGE Reservoir Characterization and Simulation Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, October.
- Al-Obaidi, D. A., Al-Jawad, M. S. (2020). Immiscible CO2-Assisted gravity drainage process for enhancing oil recovery in bottom water drive reservoir. Association of Arab Universities Journal of Engineering Sciences, 27(2), 60-66.
- Al-Obaidi, D. A., Al-Jawad, M. S. (2020). Numerical simulation of immiscible CO2-assisted gravity drainage process to enhance oil recovery. Iraqi Journal of Science, 61(8), 2004-2016.
- Shin, H., Polikar, M. (2005). New economic indicator to evaluate SAGD performance. SPE-94024-MS. In: The SPE Western Regional Meeting, Irvine, California, March. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
- McGlade, C., Sondak, G., Han, M. (2021). Whatever happened to enhanced oil recovery? International Energy Agency.
- Buckles, R. S. (1979). Steam stimulation heavy oil recovery at Cold Lake, Alberta. SPE-7994-MS. In: The SPE California Regional Meeting, Ventura, California, April.
- Beattie, C. I., Boberg, T. C., McNab, G. S. (1991). Reservoir stimulation in the Cold Lake oil sands. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 6, 200–206.
- Gael, B. T., Gross, S. J., McNaboe, G. J. (1995). Development planning and reservoir management in the Duri steam flood. SPE-29668-MS. In: The SPE Western Regional Meeting, Bakersfield, California, March.
- Bae, W. S., Masduki, A., Permadi, A. K., Abdurrahman, M. (2017). EOR in Indonesia: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Technology, 16, 250-270.
- Pearce, J. C., Megginson, E. A. (1991). Current status of the Duri steamflood project Sumatra, Indonesia. SPE-21527-MS. In: The SPE International Thermal Operations Symposium, Bakersfield, California, February.
- De Haan, H. J., van Lookeren, J. (1969). Early results of the first large-scale steam soak project in the Tia Juana Field, Western Venezuela. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 21(01), 101–110.
- Puig, F., Schenk, L. (1984). Analysis of the performance of the M-6 area of the Tia Juana Field, Venezuela, under primary, steam-soak, and steam drive conditions. SPE-12656-MS. In: The SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, April.
- Canbolat, S. (2020). Assessment of SAGD heat transfer mechanism via no condensable gas co-injection. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 195, 107936.
- Berry, M. W., Mohamed, A., Yap, B. W. (2019). Supervised and unsupervised learning for data science. Springer.
- Lam, D., Wunsch, D. C. (2014). Academic press library in signal processing: Volume 1. Signal processing theory and machine learning. Elsevier.
- Li, B., Billiter, T. C., Tokar, T. (2021). Rescaling method for improved machine-learning decline curve analysis for unconventional reservoirs. SPE Journal, 26, 1759–1772.
- Kasha, A. A., Sakhaee-Pour, A., Hussein, I. A. (2022). Machine learning for capillary pressure estimation. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 25, 1–20.
- Guo, K., Li, H., Yu, Z. (2016). In-situ heavy and extra-heavy oil recovery: A review. Fuel, 185, 886–902.
- Taher, W. I., Hamd-Allah, S. M. (2019). Feasibility study of applying a pattern waterflood without and with peripheral injectors for maximizing oil recovery under limited water sources availability a case study of heterogeneous giant carbonate reservoir. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences,14(Special Issue 7), 9923-9935.
- Ahmed, B. I., Al-Jawad, M. S. (2020). Geomechanical modelling and two-way coupling simulation for carbonate gas reservoir. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 10(8), 3619-3648.
- Zhong, Z., Sun, A. Y., Wang, Y., Ren, B. (2020). Predicting field production rates for waterflooding using a machine learning-based proxy model. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 194, 107574.
- Deng, L., Pan, Y. (2021). Data-driven proxy model for waterflood performance prediction and optimization using Echo State Network with Teacher Forcing in mature fields. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 197, 107981.
- Siggel, L., Santa, M., Hansch, M., et al. (2012, April). A new class of viscoelastic surfactants for enhanced oil recovery. SPE-153969-MS. In: The SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
- Negash, B. M., Yaw, A. D. (2020). Artificial neural network based production forecasting for a hydrocarbon reservoir under water injection. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 47, 383–392.
- Jia, D., Liu, H., Zhang, J., et al. (2020). Data-driven optimization for fine water injection in a mature oilfield. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 47, 674–682.
- Du, S. Y., Zhao, X. G., Xie, C. Y., et al. (2023). Data-driven production optimization using particle swarm algorithm based on the ensemble-learning proxy model. Petroleum Science, 20, 2951–2966.
- Kubota, L., Reinert, D. (2019). Machine learning forecasts oil rate in mature onshore field jointly driven by water and steam injection. SPE-196152-MS. In: Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
- Jia, D., Zhang, J., Li, Y., et al. (2023). Recent development of smart field deployment for mature waterflood reservoirs. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 15, 784.
- Belhaj, A. F., Elraies, K. A., Mahmood, S. M., et al. (2020). The effect of surfactant concentration, salinity, temperature, and pH on surfactant adsorption for chemical enhanced oil recovery: a review. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 10, 125-137.
- Sun, Q., Ertekin, T. (2020). Screening and optimization of polymer flooding projects using artificial-neural-network (ANN) based proxies. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 185, 106617.
- Karambeigi, M. S., Zabihi, R., Hekmat, Z. (2011). Neuro-simulation modelling of chemical flooding. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 78, 208–219.
- Amirian, E., Dejam, M., Chen, Z. (2018). Performance forecasting for polymer flooding in heavy oil reservoirs. Fuel, 216, 83–100.
- Tadjer, A., Bratvold, R. B., Hong, A., Hanea, R. (2021). Application of machine learning to assess the value of information in polymer flooding. Petroleum Research, 6(4), 309-320.
- Saberi, H., Esmaeilnezhad, E., Choi, H. J. (2021). Artificial neural network to forecast enhanced oil recovery using hydrolyzed polyacrylamide in sandstone and carbonate reservoirs. Polymers, 13(16), 2606.
- Zarepakzad, N., Artun, E., Durgut, I. (2021). A comparative analysis and rapid performance prediction of polymer flooding process by coupling reservoir simulation with neural networks. International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Technology, 27(3), 227-246.
- Sun, Q. (2017). The development of an artificial-neural-network-based toolbox for screening and optimization of enhanced oil recovery projects. Doctoral Thesis. The Pennsylvania State University, Energy and Mineral Engineering, University Park, PA, USA.
- AlAbdullah, M., Emami-Meybodi, H., Ertekin, T. (2019, June). Development and application of an artificial neural network tool for chemical EOR field implementations. SPE-195492-MS. In: The SPE Europec featured at 81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition, London, England, UK, June.
- Aihara, T., Takabe, M., Toyoda, K. (1990). Chaotic neural networks. Physics Letters A, 144(6), 333–340.
- Jiang, J., Shao, K., Wei, Y., Tian, T. (2007). Chaotic neural network model for output prediction of polymer flooding. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, Harbin, China.
- Aldhaheri, M., Wei, M., Bai, B., Alsaba, M. (2017). Development of machine learning methodology for polymer gels screening for injection wells. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 151, 77-93.
- Hou, J. R., Liu, Z. C., Dong, M. Z., et al. (2006). Effect of viscosity of alkaline/surfactant/polymer (ASP) solution on enhanced oil recovery in heterogeneous reservoirs. PETSOC-06-11-03. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 45(11).
- Ebaga-Ololo, J., Chon, B. H. (2017). Prediction of polymer flooding performance with an artificial neural network: a two-polymer-slug case. Energies, 10(7), 844.
- Alghazal, M., Ertekin, T. (2020, November). Modelling of deep polymer gel conformance treatments using machine learning. SPE-203450-MS. In: The Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
- Guevara, J. L., Patel, R. G., Trivedi, J. J. (2018, December). Optimization of steam injection for heavy oil reservoirs using reinforcement learning. SPE-193769-MS. In: The SPE International Heavy Oil Conference and Exhibition, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
- Morvan, M., Degré, G., Leng, J., et al. (2009, April). New viscoelastic fluid for chemical EOR. SPE-121675-MS. In: The SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, The Woodlands, Texas.
- Ersahin, A., Ertekin, T. (2020). Artificial neural network modelling of cyclic steam injection process in naturally fractured reservoirs. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 23(03), 0979-0991.
- Amirian, E., Leung, J. Y., Zanon, S., Dzurman, P. (2015). Integrated cluster analysis and artificial neural network
modelling for steam-assisted gravity drainage performance prediction in heterogeneous reservoirs. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(2), 723-740.
- Ansari, A., Heras, M., Nones, J., et al. (2020). Predicting the performance of steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) method utilizing artificial neural network (ANN). Petroleum, 6(4), 368-374.
- Sarapardeh, A., Kiasari, H. H., Alizadeh, N., et al. (2013). Application of fast-SAGD in naturally fractured heavy oil reservoirs: A case study. SPE-164418-MS. In: Proceedings of the SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
- Mohammadi, K., Ameli, F. (2019). Toward mechanistic understanding of Fast SAGD process in naturally fractured heavy oil reservoirs: Application of response surface methodology and genetic algorithm. Fuel, 253, 840-856.
- Merdeka, M. G., Ridha, S., Negash, B. M., Ilyas, S. U. (2022). Reservoir performance prediction in steam huff and puff injection using proxy modelling. Applied Sciences, 12(6), 3169.
- Zhang, N., Wei, M., Bai, B., et al. (2022). Pattern recognition for steam flooding field applications based on hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis. ACS Omega, 7(22), 18804-18815.
- Sarma, P., Lawrence, K., Zhao, Y., et al. (2018, December). Implementation and assessment of production optimization in a steamflood using machine-learning assisted modelling. SPE-193680-MS. In: The SPE International Heavy Oil Conference and Exhibition, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
- Sibaweihi, N., Patel, R. G., Guevara, J. L., et al. (2019, April). Real-time steam allocation workflow using machine
learning for digital heavy oil reservoirs. SPE-195312-MS. In: The SPE Western Regional Meeting, San Jose, California, USA.
- Sun, F., Yao, Y., Chen, M., et al. (2017). Performance analysis of superheated steam injection for heavy oil recovery
and modelling of wellbore heat efficiency. Energy, 125, 795-804.
- Yu, Y., Liu, S., Liu, Y., et al. (2021). Data-driven proxy model for forecasting of cumulative oil production during the steam-assisted gravity drainage process. ACS Omega, 6(17), 11497-11509.
- Li, Y., Liu, H., Jiao, P., et al. (2023). Machine‐learning‐assisted identification of steam channeling after cyclic steam stimulation in heavy‐oil reservoirs. Geofluids, 2023, 1-13.
DOI: 10.5510/OGP20260201196
E-mail: rehab.abbas2208@coeng.uobaghdad.edu.iq
Kh. M. Gamzaev
Azerbaijan State Oil and Industry University, Baku, Azerbaijan
A numerical method for restoring pressure distribution in the gas regime of reservoir development based on the model of turbulent filtration
The process of developing a rectangular gas reservoir in the gas regime is considered. A one-dimensional model of is proposed to describe this process. The pressure distribution in the reservoir at the initial moment of time, the pressure and volume flow rate of gas in the production gallery of wells are considered to be set. However, data on the pressure and flow of gas at the outer boundary of the reservoir are assumed to be unknown. Within the framework of the proposed model, the task is to determine the pressure distribution in the reservoir only based on the information specified in the operational gallery. This problem belongs to the class of boundary inverse problems. First, a discrete analogue of the problem is constructed using the method of difference approximation. To numerically solve the resulting system of difference equations, a special computational algorithm is proposed based on the use of representation for solving a system of linear algebraic equations with a tridiagonal matrix. As a result, an explicit formula was obtained for determining the pressure value at the outlet boundary of the reservoir and a recurrent formula for determining the pressure distribution in the reservoir at each time layer. To ensure the stability of the solution of the inverse problem, the method of natural regularization is used. Numerical experiments for a model gas reservoir were carried out based on the proposed computational algorithm.
Keywords: gas regime of reservoir development; rectilinearly parallel gas flow; boundary inverse problem; self-regularization method; difference approximation method.
Date submitted: 10.12.2025 Date accepted: 02.04.2026
References
- Aliev, Z. S., Basniev, K. S., Kuznetsov, O. L., Mirzadjanzade, A. Kh. (2003). Fundamentals of gas production technology. Moscow: Nedra.
- Basniev, K. S., Dmitriev, N. M., Rozenberg, G. D. (2005). Oil and gas hydromechanics. Moscow-Izhevsk: ICS.
- Suleimanov, B. A. (2022). Theory and practice of enhanced oil recovery. Moscow-Izhevsk: ICS.
- Vishnyakov, V. V., Suleimanov, B. A., Salmanov, A. V., Zeynalov, E. B. (2019). Primer on enhanced oil recovery. Gulf Professional Publishing.
- Dzhalalov, G. I. (2025). Hydrodynamic modeling as the main tool for the management of a complex hydrocarbon reservoir. a review. SOCAR Proceedings, SI1, 1-11.
- Suleimanov, B. A., Abbasov, H. F., Aliyev, R. Y., et al. (2025). Selection of proxy modelling methods for streamline simulation to waterflooding management process in oil reservoirs. SOCAR Proceedings 2, 55-60.
- Aziz, K., Settari, A. (1979). Petroleum reservoir simulation. New York: Applied Science Publishers.
- Alifanov, O. M. (2011). Inverse heat transfer problems. Berlin: Springer.
- Samarskii, A. A., Vabishchevich, P. N. (2008). Numerical methods for solving inverse problems of mathematical physics. Berlin: De Gruyter.
- Kozhanov, A. I. (2016). Inverse problems for determining boundary regimes for some equations of Sobolev type. Bulletin of the South Ural State University Ser. Mathematical Modelling, Programming & Computer Softwar, 9(2), 37–45.
- Kostin, A. B, Prilepko, A. I. (1996). On some problems of restoration of a boundary condition for a parabolic equation. Differential Equations, 32(1), 113–122.
- Prilepko, A. I., Orlovsky, D. G., Vasin, I. A. (2000). Methods for solving inverse problems in mathematical physics. New York: Marcel Dekker.
- Hasanov, A. H., Romanov, V. G. (2021). Introduction to inverse problems for differential equations. Berlin: Springer.
- Denisov, A. M. (2021). Approximate solution of inverse problems for the heat equation with a singular perturbation. Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 61(12), 2004–2014.
- Gamzaev, Kh. M. (2025). Numerical identification of hydrodynamic parameters of a reservoir under elastic-water-drive development mode. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Ser. Mathematical Modelling, Programming & Computer Software, 18(4), 56–65.
- Gamzaev, Kh. M. (2024). Identification of the boundary regime in the process of water- oil displacement from the reservoir. St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Physics and Mathematics, 17(4), 57–67.
- Gamzaev, Kh. M., Nadirov, U. M. (2025). Numerical identification of boundary condition in the elastic regime model of a two-dimensional single-well reservoir. Applied Mathematics and Computation,24(4), 608-618.
- Tabarintseva, E. V. (2018). On the estimate of accuracy of the auxiliary boundary conditions method for solving a boundary value inverse problem for a nonlinear equation. Numerical Analysis and Applications, 11(3), 236–255.
- Sidikova, A. I. (2019). A study of an inverse boundary value problem for the heat conduction equation. Numerical Analysis and Applications, 12, 70–86.
- Yaparova, N. M. (2014). Numerical methods for solving a boundary value inverse heat conduction problem. Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, 22(5), 832-847.
- Dmitriev, V. I., Stolyarov, L. V. (2017). Numerical method for the inverse boundary-value problem of the heat equation. Computational Mathematics and Modeling, 28(2), 141–147.
- Abdullayev, V. J., Gamzaev, Kh. M. (2024). A method for computing the pressure distribution in the elastic mode of single-well formation development. SOCAR Proceedings 2, 80-84.
DOI: 10.5510/OGP20260201197
E-mail: xan.h@rambler.ru
A. A. Aliyev1, G. I. Jalalov2, E. N. Mamalov2
1BP Azerbaijan, Baku, Azerbaijan; 2The Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences, Baku, Azerbaijan
Hydrodynamic modeling of water–gas injection effects in permeability-heterogeneous reservoirs
In oil fields operated under depletion drive, improving oil recovery remains a critical challenge, requiring methods that can modify the physicochemical properties of the reservoir system, improve displacement efficiency, and provide additional pressure support. This study evaluates water-gas mixture (WGM) injection, supported by digital reservoir monitoring and numerical modeling, as an integrated approach for increasing the recovery of remaining oil reserves from heterogeneous reservoirs. A series of laboratory experiments was conducted using a linear reservoir model to compare the displacement efficiency of conventional waterflooding, WGM injection, and polyacrylamide (PAM) injection. The experiments show that WGM injection, particularly when applied from the early stage of development and compared with PAM-based mobility-control displacement, enables the target recovery factor to be achieved considerably faster. This improves the time-dependent oil recovery factor, shortens the overall development period, and reduces the required volume of the displacement agent. To validate the experimental conclusions under field-scale conditions, a hydrodynamic reservoir simulation study was performed for a selected block of the Gum Deniz oil field in Azerbaijan, which is characterized by complex geology, layered heterogeneity, and variable displacement behavior. The simulation workflow was implemented using the Landmark Nexus (Nexus-Black-Oil) software package and calibrated against historical production and pressure trends. The combined laboratory and numerical modeling results confirm that WGM injection can provide stronger pressure maintenance, improved sweep efficiency, and higher recovery potential than conventional waterflooding and PAM injection, making it a promising enhanced oil recovery strategy for mature depletion-drive reservoirs.
Keywords: enhanced oil recovery; water–gas mixture injection; sweep efficiency; oil displacement; heterogeneous reservoirs; history matching; polyacrylamide; PAM; EOR.
Date submitted: 14.02.2026 Date accepted: 30.04.2026
References
- Abdullaev, V. D., Ibrahimov, Kh. M., Kyazimov, F. K., Shafiyev, T. Kh. (2016). Experimental studies on gas drive and gas-and-water oil displacement. SOCAR Proceedings, 1, 51-57.
- Corey, A. T. (1954). The interrelation between gas and oil relative permeabilities. Producers Monthly, 19(1), 38–41.
- Green, D. W., Willhite, G. P. (1998). Enhanced oil recovery. SPE Textbook Series, Vol. 6. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
- Gumrah, F., Aliyev, A., Guliyeva, J., Ozavci, O. (2012). Determining reservoir characteristics and drive mechanisms for an oil reservoir. SOCAR Proceedings, 4, 22–31.
- Gumrah, F., Aliyev, A., Ozavci, O. (2015). Evaluation of drive mechanisms on offshore oil reservoirs by analytical methods. Proceedings of ANAS. The Sciences of Earth, 3, 15–24.
- Irani, M. M., Telkov, V. P. (2021). Study of modern options for using combinations of gas and traditional flooding (water-gas impact and its alternative). SOCAR Proceedings, 2, 248–256.
- Kazimov, Sh. P. (2022). Enhanced oil recovery in water-flooded and hard-to-recover reservoirs. SOCAR Proceedings, 1, 89–93.
- Mamalov, E. N., Gorshkova, E. V. (2025). Intensification of oil production using a combined method of influencing formations. Baku: Ocaq.
- Mamalov, E. N., Jalalov, G. I., Gorshkova, E. V., Hadiyeva, A. S. (2022). Intensification of oil production using WGM. SOCAR Proceedings, 2, 78–83.
- Suleimanov, B. A., Abbasov, H. F. (2022). Enhanced oil recovery mechanism with nanofluid injection. SOCAR Proceedings, 3, 28–37.
- Suleimanov, B. A., Abbasov, H. F., Ismayilov, R. H. (2023). Enhanced oil recovery with nanofluid injection. Petroleum Science and Technology, 41(18), 1734–1751.
- Suleimanov, B. A., Veliyev, E. F. (2016). Softened water application for enhanced oil recovery. SOCAR Proceedings, 2, 24-28.
- Telkov, V. P., Mostadjeran, M. G. (2018). Evaluation of criteria for the application of polymer flooding for the displacement of heavy, highly viscous Iranian oils. Oil Gas Exposure, 4(64), 52-55.
- Gasimli, A. M., Jamalov, I. M., Aliyev, N. Sh., Kazimov, F. K. (2008). On increasing oil recovery from reservoir layers with different permeabilities. Azerbaijan Oil Industry, 3, 36–39.
- Jalalov, G. I., Aliyev, A. A. (2024). Study of unsteady state flow in a deformable formation under two-phase flow condition. SOCAR Proceedings, 2, 4–11.
- Oliver, D. S., Chen, Y. (2011). Recent progress on reservoir history matching: a review. Computational Geosciences, 15(1), 185–221.
- Efros, D. A., (1963). A study of the filtration of heterogeneous systems. Moscow: Gostoptekhizdat.
- Lake, L. W. (1989). Enhanced oil recovery. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
- Mamalov, E. N., Gorshkova, E. V. (2020). One opportunity to increase oil recovery in a layered heterogeneous reservoir. Azerbaijan Oil Industry, 3, 20–26.
- Manrique, E. J., Thomas, C. P., Ravikiran, R. (2010). EOR: current status and opportunities. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 13(06), 946–956.
- Sheng, J. J. (2015). A comprehensive review of alkaline–surfactant–polymer flooding. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 18(03), 357–372.
- Jalalov, G. I., Ibragimov, T. M., Aliyev, A. A., Gorshkova, E. V. (2018). Modeling and research of filtration processes in deep-seated oil and gas fields. Baku: Elm ve Tehsil.
DOI: 10.5510/OGP20260201198
E-mail: evgeniy_mamalov@rambler.ru
Yamama Al-Oudah1, Omar Al-Fatlawi1,2,3
1College of Engineering, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq; 2College of Engineering, Al-Naji University, Baghdad, Iraq; 3WASM: Energy and Chemical Engineering, Curtin University, WA, Australia
Hydraulic fracturing in tight oil reservoirs: a synthesis of current practices, challenges, and future trajectories
Multistage hydraulic fracturing (MHF) is the primary method for developing extremely tight oil reservoirs (TORs) with nanopores. Currently, this technology is considered the only economically viable way to develop these resources. However, MHF suffers from geomechanical limitations, including formation heterogeneity and limited pumping capacity at surface facilities. This paper reviews the current state of MHF in tight oil reservoirs, connecting geomechanical concepts to field applications and highlighting key challenges and future trends, including sustainability and digital transformation. The industry has evolved from simple planar fracturing operations to complex stimulated reservoir systems (SRS). Modern design is based on geological characteristics; in-situ stresses and natural fractures guide engineering decisions, such as the use of hydraulic fracturing fluids. However, this sector faces ongoing challenges, including overlap of parent and child wells, low recovery factors (less than 10%), and loss of conductivity, caused by gaps in the scaling of complex physical processes across time and space. Addressing these challenges is facilitated by digitalization. By harnessing data analytics, ML and real-time DAS/DTS, operators transition from a «design and pump» paradigm to a «sense and respond» approach. This empowers them to optimize real-time hydrocarbon sweep and bridge key sustainability gaps. In conclusion, this review illustrates how optimized water management, efficient operational scaling and sustainable design in MHF directly contributes to SDGs 6, 8, 9 and 12, promoting responsible global resource stewardship.
Keywords: tight oil reservoirs; hydraulic fracturing; stimulated reservoir system; fracturing fluids; energy efficiency; sustainable energy; clean energy technology.
Date submitted: 13.08.2025 Date accepted: 28.04.2026
References
- Al-Sadi, Z. A., Sadeq, D. J., Khan, M. (2025). Optimization of well locations in tight oil reservoir based on genetic algorithm. Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, 26(1), 155-163.
- Jassam, S. A., Omer, A.-F., Canbaz, C. H. (2023). Petrophysical analysis based on well logging data for tight carbonate reservoir: the SADI formation case in Halfaya oil field. Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, 24(3), 55-68.
- Jassam, S. A., Al-Fatlawi, O. (2023). Development of 3D geological model and analysis of the uncertainty in a tight oil reservoir in the Halfaya Oil Field. The Iraqi Geological Journal, 56(1B), 128-142.
- Xu, C., Tang, J., Sun, J., et al. (2025). Dynamic stress sensitive analysis of fractured tight reservoirs under compound damage from drilling and fracturing fluids. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 250, 213807.
- Al-Fatlawi, O., Hossain, M. M., Saeedi, A. (2017). A new practical method for predicting equivalent drainage area of well in tight gas reservoirs. In: SPE Europec Featured at 79th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Paris, France.
- Wang, H., Liao, X., Zhao, X. (2015). Study of tight oil reservoir flow regimes in different treated horizontal well. Journal of the Energy Institute, 88(2), 198-204.
- Al-Fatlawi, O., Hossain, M., Patel, N., Kabir, A. (2019). Evaluation of the potentials for adapting the multistage hydraulic fracturing technology in tight carbonate reservoir. SPE-194733-MS. In: SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, Manama, Bahrain, March.
- He, H., Yang, X., Hao, Y., et al. (2025). Influence of stress sensitivity on pore structure of tight reservoirs: a digital core based analysis. Petroleum Research, 10(3), 659-666.
- Alabi, O. O., Sedara, S. O. (2020). Validity of series and parallel bed layer permeability equations from experimental and numerical modeling. Scientific African, 10, e00579.
- Chen, M., Dai, J., Liu, X., et al. (2020). Effect of displacement rates on fluid distributions and dynamics during water flooding in tight oil sandstone cores from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 184, 106588.
- Ighodalo, E., Hursan, G., McCrossan, J., Ali Belowi, A. (2019). Integrated NMR fluid characterization guides stimulation in tight sand reservoirs. SPE-195061-MS. In: SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, Manama, Bahrain, March.
- Sadeq, D. J. (2024). Superposition rate: A developed approach for analyzing production data in tight gas reservoirs. The Iraqi Geological Journal, 57(2A), 214-229.
- Liu, G., Meng, Z., Wu, T. P., et al. (2015). The optimization of fracture system conductivity in tight oil reservoirs. In: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Electrical, Automation and Mechanical Engineering. Atlantis Press.
- Al-Fatlawi, O. F. (2018). Numerical simulation for the reserve estimation and production optimization from tight gas reservoirs. PhD Thesis. Curtin University.
- Wang, F., Zhao, J. (2019). A mathematical model for co-current spontaneous water imbibition into oil-saturated tight sandstone: upscaling from pore-scale to core-scale with fractal approach. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 178, 376-388.
- Singh, H., Cai, J. (2018). Screening improved recovery methods in tight-oil formations by injecting and producing through fractures. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 116, 977-993.
- Hofmann, H., Babadagli, T., Zimmermann, G. (2014). Numerical simulation of complex fracture network development by hydraulic fracturing in naturally fractured ultratight formations. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 136(4), 042905.
- Liu, Y., Zheng, X., Peng, X., et al. (2022). Influence of natural fractures on propagation of hydraulic fractures in tight reservoirs during hydraulic fracturing. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 138, 105505.
- Lyu, W., Zeng, L., Zhou, S., et al. (2019). Natural fractures in tight-oil sandstones: a case study of the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in the southwestern Ordos Basin, China. AAPG Bulletin, 103(10), 2343-2367.
- Zhang, Y., Zeng, L., Luo, Q., et al. (2020). Effects of diagenesis on natural fractures in tight oil reservoirs: a case study of the Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar Sag, Junggar Basin, NW China. Geological Journal, 55(9), 6562-6579.
- Ren, L., Wang, W., Su, Y., et al. (2018). Multiporosity and multiscale flow characteristics of a stimulated reservoir volume (SRV)-fractured horizontal well in a tight oil reservoir. Energies, 11(10), 2724.
- Zhu, W., Liu, Y., Li, Z., et al. (2021). Study on pressure propagation in tight oil reservoirs with stimulated reservoir volume development. ACS Omega, 6(4), 2589-2600.
- Fang, W., Qin, X., Liu, C., et al. (2022). Quantitative evaluation of well performance affected by fracture density and fracture connectivity in fractured tight reservoirs. Geofluids, 1, 2805348.
- Zhang, K., Sebakhy, K., Wu, K., et al. (2015). Future trends for tight oil exploitation. SPE-175699-MS. In: SPE North Africa Technical Conference and Exhibition, Cairo, Egypt, September. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
- Al-Fatlawi, O., Hossain, M., Essa, A. (2019). Optimization of fracture parameters for hydraulic fractured horizontal well in a heterogeneous tight reservoir: An equivalent homogeneous modelling approach. SPE-198185-MS. In: The SPE Kuwait Oil & Gas Show and Conference, Mishref, Kuwait, October. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
- Temizel, C., Purwar, S., Abdullayev, A., Urrutia, K. (2015). Optimization of production in slanted horizontal wells in tight reservoirs. SPE-175562-MS. In: SPE Reservoir Characterisation and Simulation Conference and Exhibition, Abu Dhabi, UAE, September.
- Temizel, C., Purwar, S., Abdullayev, A., et al. (2015). Efficient use of data analytics in optimization of hydraulic fracturing in unconventional reservoirs. SPE-177549-MS. In: Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, November. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
- Zhao, K., Huang, P., He, Y., et al. (2025). Effect of geostress variation on hydraulic fracturing behavior and stress redistribution in coal seam roofs. Processes, 13(6), 1732.
- Li, Z., Gai, K., Cao, F. (2020). Analysis of fracturing ability factors of tight reservoir. E3S Web of Conferences, 165, 01004.
- Rakkah, A. M., Abu Hassan, M. A., Altarteer, H. A., et al. (2023). Analysis of pressure interference during fracture injection tests and stimulation treatments. SPE-215693-MS. In: SPE International Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman, September. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
- Xu, W., Zhao, J., Xu, J. (2021). Fracability evaluation method for tight sandstone oil reservoirs. Natural Resources Research, 30(6), 4277-4295.
- Lu, H., Cao, S., Dong, S., et al. (2024). Control of lamination on bedding-parallel fractures in tight sandstone reservoirs: the seventh member of the upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in the Ordos Basin, China. Frontiers in Earth Science, 12, 1428316.
- Wang, F., Yang, K., Cai, J. (2018). Fractal characterization of tight oil reservoir pore structure using nuclear magnetic resonance and mercury intrusion porosimetry. Fractals, 26(02), 1840017.
- Olusola, B., Boury, N., Aguilera, R. (2017). Localized reservoir characterization model for hydraulic fracturing design in tight reservoirs. SPE-185031-MS. In: SPE Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, February. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
- Gao, Q., Ghassemi, A. (2020). Height growth in layered unconventional reservoirs: The impact of formation moduli, interfaces, and in-situ stress. SPE Production and Operations, 35(4), 756-774.
- Dong, T., Harris, N. B., Knapp, L. J., et al. (2018). The effect of thermal maturity on geomechanical properties in shale reservoirs: An example from the Upper Devonian Duvernay Formation, Western Canada Sedimentary Basin. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 97, 137-153.
- Stegent, N., Dusterhoft, R., Menon, H. (2019). Insight into hydraulic fracture geometries using fracture modeling honoring field data measurements and post-fracture production. SPE-195524-MS. In: SPE Europec featured at 81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition, London, England, UK, June.
- Cirdi, A. P., Ertekin, T., Ayala H., L. F., Dogru, A. H. (2011). Mathematical modeling of geomechanical behavior of tarmat during the depletion of giant oil reservoir-aquifer systems. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 1(2-4), 71-80.
- Zeng, Z., Harouaka, A. (2020). A new method for assessing stage-based hydraulic fracturing quality in Wolfcamp formation of Permian Basin. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 195, 107740.
- Nguyen, H. T., Lee, J. H., Elraies, K. A. (2022). Review of pseudo-three-dimensional modeling approaches in hydraulic fracturing. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 12(4), 1095-1107.
- Antonov, I. (2019). Pseudo-three-dimensional model for hydraulic fracturing with foams. Journal of Physics: Conference Series - International Conference "Emerging Trends in Applied and Computational Physics 2019" (ETACP-2019), 1236, 012055.
- Sun, C., Liu, W., Zheng, H., et al. (2019). Simulation research and application of complex fracture network for SRV. In: 2019 International Conference on Modeling, Analysis, Simulation Technologies and Applications (MASTA 2019). Atlantis Press.
- Zhou, J., Huang, H., Deo, M. (2016). Simulation of hydraulic and natural fracture interaction using a coupled DFNDEM model. In: ARMA US Rock Mechanics/ Geomechanics Symposium.
- Zhu, W., Chen, Zh., He, X., et al. (2024). Numerical analysis of the dynamic mechanisms in hydraulic fracturing with a focus on natural fractures. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 129(12), e2024JB029487.
- Kolapo, P., Ogunsola, N. O., Munemo, P., et al. (2023). DFN: an emerging tool for stochastic modelling and geomechanical design. Eng, 4(1), 174-205.
- Li, L., Guo, X., Zhou, M., et al. (2021). Numerical modeling of fluid flow in tight oil reservoirs considering complex fracturing networks and Pre-Darcy flow. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 207, 109050.
- Cai, M., Li, M., Zhu, X., et al. (2022). Comprehensive evaluation of rock mechanical properties and in-situ stress in tight sandstone oil reservoirs. Frontiers in Earth Science, 10, 911504.
- Lima, R. O., do Nascimento Guimarães, L. J., Pereira, L. C. (2021). Evaluating geomechanical effects related to the production of a Brazilian reservoir. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 11(6), 2661-2678.
- Wu, L., Zhang, L. X., Guo, Y. K. (2014). A review of the extended finite element for fracture analysis of structures. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 444, 96-102.
- Youn, D. J., Griffiths, D. V. (2015). Stochastic analysis of hydraulic fracture propagation using the extended finite element method and random field theory. In: ISRM Regional Symposium - 8th South American Congress on Rock Mechanics, SACRM 2015.
- Fatalla, A. A., Arzani, S., Veseli, E., et al. (2023). Revolutionizing systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The role of artificial intelligence in evidence synthesis. Dental Hypotheses, 14(4), 93-94.
- Chen, S. (2023). Discrete element methods with special focus on DDA. In: Advanced computational methods and geomechanics. Springer.
- Fatahi, H., Hossain, M. M., Sarmadivaleh, M. (2017). Numerical and experimental investigation of the interaction of natural and propagated hydraulic fracture. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 37, 409-424.
- Adams, J., Rowe, C. (2013). Differentiating applications of hydraulic fracturing. In: ISRM International Conference for Effective and Sustainable Hydraulic Fracturing.
- Hossain, M. M., Rahman, M. K., Rahman, S. S. (2000). Hydraulic fracture initiation and propagation: roles of wellbore trajectory, perforation and stress regimes. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 27(3), 129-149.
- Hossain, M. M., Rahman, M. K., Rahman, S. S. (1999). A comprehensive monograph for hydraulic fracture initiation from deviated wellbores under arbitrary stress regimes. In: SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Jakarta, Indonesia, April.
- Sedda, P., Parziale, S., Giammancheri, M., et al. (2018). Multistage hydraulic fracturing campaign learning curve in a tight sandstone reservoir, offshore West Africa. In: SPE International Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition, Muscat, Oman, October. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
- Tiemann, M., Vann, A. (2013). Hydraulic fracturing and safe drinking water act issues. In: The Marcellus Shale Gas Resource: Development and Water Issues.
- Yu, H., He, Z., Zhang, W., et al. (2024). The best practices and workflow of tight reservoir fracturing diagnosis, optimization, and productivity evaluation. In: APOGCE 2024, Perth, Australia, October.
- Su, H., Zhou, F., Zheng, A., et al. (2021). Fracturing scheme design for unconventional reservoirs based on geology-engineering integration method. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 984, 012014.
- Lu, Y., Li, H., Lu, C., et al. (2018). An integrated approach to optimize perforation cluster parameters for horizontal wells in tight oil reservoirs. SPE-191790-18ERM-MS. In: SPE/AAPG Eastern Regional Meeting, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, October.
- Pasumarthi, R., Koduru, A., Meena, H., et al. (2023). Revolutionizing oil production: the success of enhanced hydraulic fracturing techniques in tight oil field reservoirs. SPE-215617-MS. In: SPE International Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman, September.
- Xu, Y., Mu, L., Yang, X. G., et al. (2013). Understanding tight oil reservoir hydraulic fracturing stimulation using two wells simultaneous micro seismic monitoring approach. IPTC-16529-MS. In: International Petroleum Technology Conference, Beijing, China, March.
- Castiblanco, R., Ibrahim, E. G., Moiseenkov, A., et al. (2018). Evaluation of hydraulic fracturing effectiveness by combined analysis of spectral noise logging and high precision temperature logging data and subsequent numerical temperature modelling. SPE-191446-18IHFT-MS. In: SPE International Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition,
Muscat, Oman, October.
- Perez, O., Fragachan, F. E., Omer, M., Huang, J. (2020). Emerging fluid design with enhanced proppant carrying capacity: an integrated geomechanical workflow. IPTC-20108-MS. In: International Petroleum Technology Conference, Dhahran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, January.
- Kostenuk, N., Gagnon, P. (2008). Polymer reduction leads to increased success: a comparative study. SPE Drilling & Completion, 23(01), 55-60.
- Legemah, M., Debenedictis, F., Workneh, N., et al. (2014). Successful treatment of a green river sandstone formation using a novel low-polymer crosslinked fluid. SPE-168186-MS. In: SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA, February.
- Ishak, K.E.H.K., Khan, J. A., Padmanabhan, E., et al. (2023). Friction reducers in hydraulic fracturing fluid systems–A review. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2682, 030004.
- Cheng, B., Li, J., Su, H., et al. (2022). Pore-scale formation damage caused by fracturing fluids in low-permeability sandy conglomerate reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 208(A), 109301.
- Li, X., Zhang, Q., Liu, P., et al. (2022). Investigation on the microscopic damage mechanism of fracturing fluids to low-permeability sandstone oil reservoir by nuclear magnetic resonance. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 209, 109821.
- Loginov, A., Pavlova, S., Olennikova, O., et al. (2019). Introduction of novel alternative to guar-based fracturing fluid for Russian conventional reservoirs. SPE-196971-MS. In: SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference, Moscow, Russia, October.
- Woodworth, T. R., Miskimins, J. L. (2007). Extrapolation of laboratory proppant placement behavior to the field in slickwater fracturing applications. In: SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, College Station, Texas, U.S.A., January.
- Bestaoui-Spurr, N. (2014). Materials science improves silica sand strength. In: SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA, February.
- Xinquan, Z. (2020). Evaluating the relationship between proppant performance and conductivity using multivariate statistical analysis method. In: 54th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium.
- Ramazanov, V., Matovu, S., Al Shafloot, T., Alarifi, S. A. (2025). Enhancing fracturing proppant performance: methods and assessment. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 50(7), 4477-4503.
- Bestaoui-Spurr, N., Li, C. (2018). Ultra-light weight proppants for better placement. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, USA, September.
- Kolawole, O., Wigwe, M., Ispas, I., Watson, M. (2020). How will treatment parameters impact the optimization of hydraulic fracturing process in unconventional reservoirs? SN Applied Sciences, 2(11), 1865.
- Fuss, T., Shi, J., Ma, J., et al. (2014). Environmental responsibility of current proppant solutions. SPE-169571-MS. In: SPE Western North American and Rocky Mountain Joint Meeting, Denver, Colorado, April. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
- Agrawal, S., Gernand, J. M. (2020). Quantifying the economic impact of hydraulic fracturing proppant selection in light of occupational exposure risk and functional requirements. Risk Analysis, 40(2), 319-335.
- Rodoplu, R. S., Malik, A. R., Hababi, A. H., Al-Mohanna, K. S. (2023). Cemented multi stage fracturing completion system – an alternative to open hole MSF and plug-and-perf. SPE-215720-MS. In: SPE International Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman, September.
- Oparin, M., Crawford, E., Alzahrani, B., et al. (2024). Nonintrusive rapid evaluation of fracture isolation in plugand-perf completions based on data science methodology. IPTC-24435-EA. In: International Petroleum Technology Conference, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, February.
- Aviles, I., Dardis, M., Jacob, G. (2015). Degradable alternative to risky mill-out operations in plug and perf. SPE-173695-MS. In: SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing & Well Intervention Conference & Exhibition, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, March.
- Evans, S., Siddiqui, S., Magness, J. (2018). Impact of cluster spacing on infill completions in the Eagle Ford. URTEC-2899323-MS. In: SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA, July.
- Salah, M., Ibrahim, M. (2018). Engineered fracture spacing staging and perforation cluster spacing optimization for multistage fracturing horizontal wells. SPE-191654-MS. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, USA, September.
- Elgibaly, A. A., Farhat, M., Othman, M. (2016). An optimum limited entry for multiple zone stimulation by hydraulic fracturing. Journal of Petroleum and Mining Engineering, 18(1), 84-93.
- Oberhofer, R. (2016). Application of ball-drop technology to improve efficiency and stimulation of limited entry completion systems. SPE-183427-MS. In: Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, November.
- McDaniel, B. W., Willett, R. M., Underwood, P. J. (1999). Limited-entry frac applications on long intervals of highly deviated or horizontal wells. SPE-56780-MS. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, October.
- Cramer, D., Friehauf, K., Roberts, G., Whittaker, J. (2019). Integrating DAS, treatment pressure analysis and video-based perforation imaging to evaluate limited entry treatment effectiveness. SPE-194334-MS. In: SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, February.
- Ge, X., Alotibi, A., Al-Hlaichi, A., et al. (2024). Novel re-crosslinkable preformed particle gels (RPPG) for parentand infill-well-fracture interactions mitigation. SPE-221365-MS. In: SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Wheeling, West Virginia, USA, October.
- Gala, D. P., Manchanda, R., Sharma, M. M. (2018). Modeling of fluid injection in depleted parent wells to minimize damage due to frac-hits. URTEC-2881265-MS. In: SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA, July.
- Yu, L., Wang, J., Wang, C., Chen, D. (2019). Enhanced tight oil recovery by volume fracturing in Chang 7 reservoir: experimental study and field practice. Energies, 12(12), 2419.
- Xu, G., Yin, H., Yuan, H., Xing, C. (2020). Decline curve analysis for multiple-fractured horizontal wells in tight oil reservoirs. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 4(3), 296-304.
- Li, S., Cai, B., He, C., et al. (2022). Frac fluid induced damage in tight sands and shale reservoirs. SPE-208873-MS. In: SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA, February.
- Reinicke, A., Rybacki, E., Stanchits, S., et al. (2010). Hydraulic fracturing stimulation techniques and formation damage mechanisms—Implications from laboratory testing of tight sandstone–proppant systems. Geochemistry, 70, 107-117.
- Haitao, L., Hongwen, L., Jianfeng, Z., Junchao, W. (2018). Rate-transient analysis in multifractured horizontal wells of tight oil reservoir. SPE Production & Operations, 33(04), 718-738.
- Qanbari, F., Clarkson, C. (2016). Rate-transient analysis of liquid-rich tight/shale reservoirs using the dynamic drainage area concept: examples from north american reservoirs. SPE-180230-MS. In: SPE Low Perm Symposium, Denver, Colorado, USA, May.
- Jiang, R., Xu, J., Sun, Zh., et al. (2014). Rate transient analysis for multistage fractured horizontal well in tight oil reservoirs considering stimulated reservoir volume. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014(1), 489015.
- Okouma, V., Symmons, D., Hosseinpour-Zonoozi, N., et al. (2012). Practical considerations for decline curve analysis in unconventional reservoirs—application of recently developed time-rate relations. SPE-162910-MS. In: SPE Hydrocarbon Economics and Evaluation Symposium, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, September.
- Ruiz Maraggi, L. M., Walsh, M. P., Lake, L.W. (2024). A new approach to apply decline-curve analysis for tight-oil reservoirs producing under variable pressure conditions. SPE Journal, 29(03), 1655-1671.
- Zeidouni, M. (2023). Rate-pressure-time analysis for reserve estimation, in shale hydrocarbon recovery: basic concepts and reserve estimation. Springer.
- Zhang, C., Cheng, S., Wang, Y., et al. (2022). Rate transient behavior of wells intercepting non-uniform fractures in a layered tight gas reservoir. Energies, 15(15), 5705.
- Aydin, H., Boppano, N., Yurukcu, M., et al. (2022). A comprehensive review of RTA/DCA methods in unconventional reservoirs. SPE-209321-MS. In: SPE Western Regional Meeting, Bakersfield, California, USA, April.
- Hamdi, H., Behmanesh, H., Clarkson, C. R. (2020). A semianalytical approach for analysis of wells exhibiting multiphase transient linear flow: application to field data. SPE Journal, 25(06), 3265-3279.
- Muhammad, R.B., Srivastava, A., Alyaev, S., et al. (2025). High-precision geosteering via reinforcement learning and particle filters. Computational Geosciences, 29(2), 14.
- Khebzegga, O., Chen, Y., J Rey, A., Wang, B. (2023). Integrating geomechanics studies to shale and tight phased development - application to Delaware Basin. SPE-212224-MS. In: SPE Reservoir Simulation Conference, Galveston, Texas, USA, March.
- Min, K. S., Yu, X., Azzolina, N. A., et al. (2025). Understanding and managing parent-child well interactions in the Bakken. URTEC-4242737-MS. In: SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA, June.
- Peng, J., McEwen, J., Bang, V., et al. (2022). An integrated development optimization platform for well sequencing and unconventional reservoir management. URTEC-3718216-MS. In: SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA, June.
- Li, X., Zhou, W., Xie, L., et al. (2023). Study on in-situ stress evolution and infill well fractures propagation in unconventional reservoir. SPE-216686-MS. In: ADIPEC, Abu Dhabi, UAE, October.
- Xu, H. (2020). Probing nanopore structure and confined fluid behavior in shale matrix: A review on small-angle neutron scattering studies. International Journal of Coal Geology, 217, 103325.
- Yan, C., Zhang, P., Dong, L., et al. (2024). Long‐term fracture conductivity in tight reservoirs. Energy Science & Engineering, 12(3), 1187-1199.
- Wu, Z., Cui, C., Jia, P., et al. (2022). Advances and challenges in hydraulic fracturing of tight reservoirs: A critical review. Energy Geoscience, 3(4), 427-435.
- Varma, N., Negi, A., Kumar, M., et al. (2023). Tight oil field development challenges, lessons learnt and successful implementation of selected artificial lift (SRP) along with operational & digital solutions: ABH Field, Rajasthan, India. IPTC-23079-MS. In: International Petroleum Technology Conference, Bangkok, Thailand, March.
- Alkhowaildi, M. A., Mahmoud, M., Bataweel, M. A., Tawabini, B. (2021). A comprehensive review on the characteristics, challenges and reuse opportunities associated with produced water in fracturing operations. SPE-207835-MS. In: Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, November.
- Elazab, S. A., de Melo, A. B., Nechakh, A., et al. (2024). Utilizing extremely high salinity waters for unconventional hydraulic fracturing in the UAE - A chemistry oriented solution. SPE-219020-MS. In: SPE Water Lifecycle Management Conference and Exhibition, Abu Dhabi, UAE, March.
- Savvaidis, A., Lomax, A., Breton, C. (2020). Induced seismicity in the Delaware Basin, West Texas, is caused by hydraulic fracturing and wastewater disposal. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 110(5), 2225-2241.
- Li, J.Y., Qi, C.-Y., Wu, B.-H., et al. (2023). Study on fracture propagation in tight sandstone by large-scale physical simulation experiments. In: Lin, J. (eds) Proceedings of the International Field Exploration and Development Conference 2022. IFEDC 2022. Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering. Springer, Singapore.
- Kalam, S., Alnuaim, S. A., Rammay, M. H. (2016). Application of artificial intelligence for water coning problem in hydraulically fractured tight oil reservoirs. OTC-26450-MS. In: Offshore Technology Conference Asia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, March.
- Birkholzer, J. T., Morris, J., Bargar, J. R., et al. (2021). A new modeling framework for multi-scale simulation of hydraulic fracturing and production from unconventional reservoirs. Energies, 14(3), 641.
- Manjunath, G. L., Liu, Z., Jha, B. (2023). Multi-stage hydraulic fracture monitoring at the lab scale. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 289, 109448.
- Hou, B., Zhang, Q., Chen, M. (2023). Status and tendency of physical simulation technology for hydraulic fracturing of shale reservoirs. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 51(5), 66-77.
- Zhu, G. L., Saji, R. P., Mubarak, H., et al. (2019). Experimental and numerical investigation of hydraulic fracturing under reservoir conditions. ARMA-2019-1734. In: 53rd U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, New York City, New York, June.
- Settari, A., Sullivan, R. B., Rother, R. J., Skinner, T. K. (2009). Comprehensive coupled modeling analysis of stimulations and post-frac productivity—case study of a tight gas field in Wyoming. SPE-119394-MS. In: SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, January.
- Cordovil, A. G., Silva, R. O., Rossi, D. F. (2025). Data-assimilation approach applied to stress matching in buzios field geomechanics. In: 59th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium.
- Samoilov, M., Pavlov, V., Pavlyukov, N., Timirtdinov, A. (2021). Integrated geomechanical modeling and hydraulic fracturing design: from particular cases to the overall result. SPE-206641-MS. In: SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference, Virtual, October.
- Zhao, M., Yuan, B., Liu, Y., et al. (2024). Dynamic prediction of fracture propagation in horizontal well hydraulic fracturing: A data-driven approach for geo-energy exploitation. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 241, 213182.
- Ma, Z., Zhang, J., Li, J., et al. (2025). Prediction of fracture morphology parameters in unconventional reservoir fracturing: innovative insights driven by deep learning. ARMA-2025-0185. In: 59th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Santa Fe, New Mexico, June. Yamama Al-Oudah et al. / SOCAR Proceedings No.2 (2026) 095-109
- Chen, W., Zhao, G., Ma, B., et al. (2025). AI-enhanced workflow for rapid fracture geometry characterization and reservoir simulation in a tight oil reservoir. URTEC-4261956-MS. In: SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA, June.
- Hui, M.-H., Dufour, G., Sarah Vitel, S., et al. (2019). A robust embedded discrete fracture modeling workflow for simulating complex processes in field-scale fractured reservoirs. SPE-193827-MS. In: SPE Reservoir Simulation Conference, Galveston, Texas, USA, April.
- Wong, D. L. Y., Doster, F., Kamp, A., Geiger, S. (2018). Systematic hybrid modelling using fracture subset upscaling. In: ECMOR XVI - 16th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, Volume 2018, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
- Miah, M. I. (2020). Predictive models and feature ranking in reservoir geomechanics: A critical review and research guidelines. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 82, 103493.
- Mund, B., Sharda, R., Das, A., et al. (2017). Geomechanical model and its role in hydraulic fracturing of a volcanic reservoir, Barmer Basin, India. SPE-185397-MS. In: SPE Oil and Gas India Conference and Exhibition, Mumbai, India, April.
- Sheikhi Garjan, Y., Ghaneezabadi, M. (2020). Machine learning interpretability application to optimize well completion in Montney. SPE-200019-MS. In: SPE Canada Unconventional Resources Conference, Virtual, September.
- Li, W., Zhang, T., Liu, X., et al. (2024). Machine learning-based fracturing parameter optimization for horizontal wells in Panke field shale oil. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 6046.
- Gao, Y. (2024). Dynamic prediction and optimization of tight reservoir development based on machine learning. In: 2024 3rd International Conference on Data Analytics, Computing and Artificial Intelligence (ICDACAI).
- Asif, A. B., Hansen, J., Khan, A. M., Sheshtawy, M. (2021). Integration of post-fracturing spectral noise log, temperature modeling, and production log diagnoses water production and resolves uncertainties in openhole multistage fracturing. SPE-204668-MS. In: SPE Middle East Oil & Gas Show and Conference, event canceled, November.
- Fan, X., Wang, W., Zhu, S., et al. (2023). Enhanced imbibition through wettability alteration during shut-in treatment after hydraulic fracturing. ARMA-2023-0719. In: 57th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, June.
- Cortez, J., Singh, D. (2014). Customizable synergistic dual breaker technology improves fracture fluid cleanup. In: Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference.
- Almubarak, M., Almubarak, T., Hong Ng, J., et al. (2020). Recent advances in waterless fracturing fluids: a review. SPE-202981-MS. In: Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, November.
DOI: 10.5510/OGP20260201199
E-mail: omar.al-fatlawi@alnaji-uni.edu.iq
M. A. Huseynov, R. R. Mammadov
«OilGasScientificResearchProject» Institute, SOCAR, Baku, Azerbaijan
Observation-driven AI framework for integrated geological–hydrodynamic reservoir modelling
This study presents an observation-driven approach for integrated geological and hydrodynamic reservoir modelling using multi-source data. Reservoir systems are complex due to heterogeneous structures, nonlinear flow behaviour, and limited direct access to subsurface information. These factors make accurate modelling a challenging task in reservoir engineering. Conventional modelling approaches usually follow a sequential workflow from geological interpretation to numerical simulation. This often increases computational cost and introduces uncertainty in model construction. To address these limitations, the study explores the use of artificial intelligence methods together with physics-informed and hybrid modelling concepts. In the proposed framework, geological, petrophysical, and production data are combined in a unified processing scheme. A simple encoder–decoder structure is used to extract latent features that describe reservoir behaviour. A bridge mechanism is introduced to connect these features with physically meaningful reservoir properties such as connectivity, flow capacity, and pressure response. The method does not replace traditional reservoir simulation but aims to support it by improving data integration and reducing computational effort. A synthetic validation study shows that the proposed approach can reproduce main reservoir behaviour trends with reasonable accuracy. Overall, the results suggest that data-driven methods, when guided by physical understanding, can be a useful complement to classical reservoir modelling workflows.
Keywords: reservoir modelling; artificial intelligence; data integration; physics-informed methods; hybrid modelling; surrogate models.
Date submitted: 12.03.2026 Date accepted: 09.06.2026
References
- Abdullayev, V. C., Huseynov, M. A., Mammadov, R. R. (2024). Research methods of the potential of long-term operated reservoirs based on the hydrodynamic model. SOCAR Proceedings, SI1, 84–88.
- Abdullayev, V. C., Huseynov, M. A., Nabiyev, K. M., Hamidov, N. N. (2010). About the construction of hydrodynamic model and forecasting of reservoir performance of perspective gas-condensate structure. SOCAR Proceedings, 1, 29–33.
- Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., Karniadakis, G. E. (2019). Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear PDEs. Journal of Computational Physics, 378, 686–707.
- Abdullayev, V. J., Huseynov, M. A., Ismyilov, M. M., Nabiyev, K. M. (2014). 3D geological modeling of «Guneshli» reservoir for increasing final development stage efficiency. SOCAR Proceedings, 2, 75–82.
- Hamidov, N. N. (2020) Study of the injection process of “dry” hydrocarbon gas at different stages of gas-condensate fields development. SOCAR Proceedings, 2, 23–29.
- Aliyev, N. Sh. (2025). Integrated upscaling techniques in Chirag reservoir modelling. SOCAR Proceedings, 4, 31–38.
- Karniadakis, G. E., Kevrekidis, I. G., Lu, L., et al. (2021). Physics-informed machine learning. Nature Reviews Physics, 3, 422–440.
- Chan, S., Elsheikh, A. (2017). Parametric generation of geological models using generative adversarial networks. Computational Geosciences, 21, 1201–1214.
- Chen, Y., Oliver, D.S. (2013). Ensemble-based reservoir history matching. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 109, 123–137.
- Nurgaliev, R. Z., Fattakhov, I. G., Khusnutdinova, R. R., et al. (2023). A method for assessing the effectiveness of water isolation works based on the development of a hydrodynamic model. SOCAR Proceedings, 1, 94–99.
- Aliyev, N. Sh. (2024). Waterflood reservoir modelling for Chirag oilfield. SOCAR Proceedings, 1, 40–47.
- Liu, Y., Durlofsky, L. (2020). Machine learning-based surrogate modeling for reservoir simulation. Computational Geosciences, 24, 1245–1263.
- Laloy, E., Jacques, D. (2019). Deep learning for inverse problems in hydrogeology. Water Resources Research, 55, 1–18.
- Pyrcz, M. J., Deutsch, C. V. (2014). Geostatistical reservoir modeling. Oxford University Press.
- Durlofsky, L. J., Chen, Y. (2013). Recent developments in surrogate modeling for subsurface flow simulation. Journal of Computational Physics, 248, 1–18.
- Mosser, L., Dubrule, O., Blunt, M. (2017). Reconstruction of three-dimensional porous media using generative adversarial neural networks. Physical Review E, 96(4), 043309.
- Fataliyev, V. M., Hamidov, N. N. (2017). Effective «vaporizer» for recovering retrograde hydrocarbon condensate from a gas-condensate reservoir. Journal of Petrochemical Science & Engineering, 2(6), 1–7.
- Fataliyev, V. M., Hamidov, N. N., Aliyev, K. F. (2025). Advances in understanding and controlling liquid loading in gas-condensate production well. SOCAR Proceedings, 2, 65–103.
- Tartakovsky, A. M., Marrero, C. O. (2020). Learning parameters of subsurface flow models using physics-informed neural
networks. Journal of Computational Physics, 418, 109629.
- Zhang, Y., Pan, Z., Wang, X., Yang, D. (2020). Machine learning-based reservoir production forecasting: A review. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 47(5), 1043–1059.
- Zhao, T., Li, J., Li, Z. (2022). Deep learning-assisted reservoir modeling: A review. Energy & AI, 7, 100128.
- Sun, A. Y., Scanlon, B. R. (2019). Combining physics-based modeling and machine learning for groundwater simulation. Water Resources Research, 55(1), 1–19.
- Huseynova, N. I., Safarov, N. M., Safarova, G. N. (2023). Hydrodynamic simulation of the current state of liquid filtration under water emulsion impact on oil layer. SOCAR Proceedings, SI1, 87–95.
- Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press.
- Karniadakis G.E. (2021). Physics-informed machine learning and hybrid modeling frameworks. Nature Reviews Physics, 3, 422–440.
DOI: 10.5510/OGP20260201200
E-mail: mehdi.huseynov@socar.az